without having to navigate to a separate tree.
So, for example, with UR you can have tasks in separate folders or together with related notes, docs, web pages, images, etc. UR has one tree per DB, but any type of item can go into the tree. However, it appears each tree is limited to a single template such as note, task, contact or password. I heard TDB allows multiple trees within a database which I see is true. TDB appears to have only copy and paste or import of the text, rich text or html file types it supports. In addition to text, rich text, DOC and HTML, Ultra Recall handles a wide variety of file/document types including PDF, XLS, XLSX, DOCX, image files, etc.įurthermore, it's possible to copy or link items into UR with drag and drop or copy and link buttons integrated into IE and Outlook. This approach is less convenient and self-contained, but gives UR more power and flexibility. UR's rich text editor is limited, but gets around this by letting you view/edit any document type in it's native editor and save directly back into UR. TDB definitely has superior rich text editing capabilities. Any significant mistakes or omissions? I could have gone into even more UR features, but these are the things that stood out for me:Īs a long-time Ultra Recall user, the positive comments about TreeDBNotes finally inspired me to take a quick look (by no means thorough or in-depth). Here are my comments posted on Bits du Jour, but I'm leery about doing quick-n-dirty evaluations. Let's just say my positive feelings about UR were only strengthened. The current appearance on Bits du Jour prompted me to do a quick comparison.
I've read discussions about TreeDBNotes over the years.